top of page

LLM Data Labeling Strategies for Product Managers

For product managers navigating the AI landscape, an often underestimated aspect of AI product development is data labeling. It’s not just about labeling; it’s about doing it right and cost-effectively. In this post, we delve into the top five reasons why product managers must master the art of reducing labeling costs for fine-tuning LLMs.

1. Budget Optimization: Making Every Penny Count

The adage, “money saved is money earned,” holds particularly true for AI development. Data labeling is typically one of the most significant expenses in this domain. Active learning, outsourcing to cost-effective services, or utilizing pre-labeled datasets are strategies that can be employed to economize the process.

By optimizing the budget allocation for data labeling, product managers free up resources that can be invested in innovation, enhancing product features, and better catering to market demands. In a field where the competition is intense, a strategically allocated budget can make the difference between a market leader and an also-ran.

One way to reduce cost is to embrace innovative solutions like the Self-Instruct framework. This framework, helps language models improve their ability to follow natural language instructions. It does this by using the model's own generations to create a large collection of instructional data. With Self-Instruct, it is possible to improve the instruction-following capabilities of language models without relying on extensive manual annotation.

2. Data Quality: The Cornerstone of Performance

Data is the fuel that drives AI engines. However, not all data is created equal. The quality of data used for training and fine-tuning LLMs is paramount. The labeling process is where product managers can exert a significant influence over data quality.

By setting clear guidelines for labeling, ensuring the data is representative of real-world scenarios, and validating labels regularly, product managers can significantly enhance data quality. A model trained on high-quality data not only performs better but also requires fewer iterations for optimization, saving time and resources in the long run.

The open source Open Assistant project provides a comprehensive labeling guideline at that will help you craft your guidelines. Also, many LLM fine-tuning solutions come with labeling guidelines. I listed below the six most known solutions to read more about their guidelines.

3. Faster Time to Market: The Early Bird Gets the Worm

In the ever-evolving AI market, speed is of the essence to provide your product a substantial advantage. This is where cost-effective labeling comes into play.

Understanding and reducing labeling costs often involve streamlining and automating parts of the process. Techniques like weak supervision, where noisy or approximate labels are used, can drastically reduce the time needed for data preparation. A product that hits the market quicker has a first-mover advantage, which can be invaluable in establishing a strong market presence.

4. Tailored Training: A Custom Fit

A ‘one size fits all’ approach rarely works in the AI industry. Product managers must ensure that LLMs are fine-tuned to the specific use cases of their products. Efficient labeling allows for a strategic selection of data to be labeled, which can immensely benefit the training process.

For instance, focusing on labeling data representing edge cases, rare scenarios, or data that is highly representative of the target user base ensures that the model excels in core use cases. A well-tailored model meets customer expectations more effectively and can carve a niche in the market.

5. Risk Mitigation: Navigating the Minefield

The AI industry can be a minefield of legal and reputational risks. Poorly labeled data can introduce biases or inaccuracies into AI models, which can lead to serious consequences, including reputational damage or legal issues.

By understanding the intricacies of data labeling, product managers can put checks and controls in place. This may include setting up diverse teams for labeling, employing multiple annotators and consensus strategies, and conducting periodic audits of the labeled data. Navigating this minefield effectively is essential for the long-term sustainability of the product.

The U.S. Department of Commerce National Institute of Standards and Technology collaborated with the private and public sectors, to develop a framework to better manage risks to individuals, organizations, and society associated with artificial intelligence (AI). The result is the NIST AI Risk Management Framework. Download and read more at Trustworthy & Responsible AI Resource Center website at .

Wrapping Up

Data labeling is an art that product managers must master to ensure the success of AI products. It’s not just about getting data labeled; it’s about doing it smartly and cost-effectively. By optimizing the budget, ensuring high-quality data, speeding up the time-to-market, tailoring the training, and mitigating risks, product managers can navigate the complex waters of AI development with greater confidence and efficacy.

At the end of the day, product managers who excel in understanding and implementing cost-effective data labeling strategies are those who will lead the charge in the AI-driven future.

This is where the Generative AI for Product and Business Innovation LIVE program comes to your help. In this program, you will learn about Generative AI lifecycle, use cases, and limitations, enabling participants to identify and solve business problems with Generative AI. Furthermore, you will learn about the AI algorithms, MLOps lifecycle, including the deployment aspects. Join now to become a business professional with Generative AI expertise and harness its potential for your business. Watch the students testimonial and sign up for the next cohort now at

Remember, in the AI world, data is king, but only if it’s smartly and efficiently labeled!

95 views0 comments


bottom of page